The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prognosticating COVID Therapeutic Responses: Ambiguous Loss and Disenfranchised Grief
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.799593 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harjinder Kaur-Aujla, Kate Lillie, Christopher Wagstaff |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,384,394
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,680
of 14,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,030
of 438,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#245
of 1,065 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,065 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.