The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expert-Led Module Improves Non-STEM Undergraduate Perception of and Willingness to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.816692 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina N. Morra, Sarah J. Adkins-Jablonsky, M. Elizabeth Barnes, Obadiah J. Pirlo, Sloan E. Almehmi, Bianca J. Convers, Derek L. Dang, Michael L. Howell, Ryleigh Fleming, Samiksha A. Raut |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,377,876
of 26,107,981 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,992
of 14,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,436
of 449,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#169
of 1,122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,107,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.