The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Visualized Dynamic Prediction Model for Lymphatic Metastasis in Ewing's Sarcoma for Smart Medical Services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.877736 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenle Li, Chan Xu, Zhaohui Hu, Shengtao Dong, Haosheng Wang, Qiang Liu, Zhi-Ri Tang, Wanying Li, Bing Wang, Zhi Lei, Chengliang Yin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,175,960
of 23,861,036 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,292
of 11,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,040
of 431,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#430
of 1,108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,861,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.