↓ Skip to main content

A socio-ecological approach to inclusive physical education in China: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A socio-ecological approach to inclusive physical education in China: A systematic review
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902791
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Liang, Minghui Li, Yandan Wu, Xueping Wu, Xiaohui Hou, Cindy Hui-Ping Sit

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 18 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 18 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,898,929
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,054
of 10,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,267
of 431,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#530
of 1,265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.