The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When Lack of Trust in the Government and in Scientists Reinforces Social Inequalities in Vaccination Against COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathalie Bajos, Alexis Spire, Léna Silberzan, Antoine Sireyjol, Florence Jusot, Laurence Meyer, Jeanna-Eve Franck, Josiane Warszawski, The EpiCov study group, Nathalie Bajos, Josiane Warszawski, Guillaume Bagein, Emilie Counil, Florence Jusot, Nathalie Lydie, Claude Martin, Laurence Meyer, Philippe Raynaud, Alexandra Rouquette, Ariane Pailhé, Delphine Rahib, Patrick Sillard, Rémy Slama, Alexis Spire |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,755,155
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,937
of 10,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,091
of 436,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#435
of 1,213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.