↓ Skip to main content

Training needs and curriculum of continuing medical education among general practitioners in Tibet, China: A cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training needs and curriculum of continuing medical education among general practitioners in Tibet, China: A cross-sectional survey
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.914847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kang An, Lin Zhang, Runjuan Qiao, Caizheng Li, Qian Zhong, Yiru Ma, Xin Rao, Tingrui Mao, Feng Liu, Qiang Zhuo, Yi She, Shuangqing Li, Qiaoli Su

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#18,967,052
of 23,507,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#6,299
of 11,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,202
of 440,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#783
of 1,446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.