The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Persistently high incidence rates of childhood acute leukemias from 2010 to 2017 in Mexico City: A population study from the MIGICCL
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.918921 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janet Flores-Lujano, David Aldebarán Duarte-Rodríguez, Elva Jiménez-Hernández, Jorge Alfonso Martín-Trejo, Aldo Allende-López, José Gabriel Peñaloza-González, María Luisa Pérez-Saldivar, Aurora Medina-Sanson, José Refugio Torres-Nava, Karina Anastacia Solís-Labastida, Luz Victoria Flores-Villegas, Rosa Martha Espinosa-Elizondo, Raquel Amador-Sánchez, Martha Margarita Velázquez-Aviña, Laura Elizabeth Merino-Pasaye, Nora Nancy Núñez-Villegas, Ana Itamar González-Ávila, María de los Ángeles del Campo-Martínez, Martha Alvarado-Ibarra, Vilma Carolina Bekker-Méndez, Rocío Cárdenas-Cardos, Silvia Jiménez-Morales, Roberto Rivera-Luna, Haydee Rosas-Vargas, Norma C. López-Santiago, Angélica Rangel-López, Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda, Elizabeth Vega, Minerva Mata-Rocha, Omar Alejandro Sepúlveda-Robles, José Arellano-Galindo, Juan Carlos Núñez-Enríquez, Juan Manuel Mejía-Aranguré |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#16,695,610
of 24,557,820 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,737
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,068
of 423,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#524
of 1,380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,557,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.