The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the impact and cost-effectiveness of chlamydia management strategies in Hong Kong: A modeling study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.932096 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Montes-Olivas, Yaz Ozten, Martin Homer, Katy Turner, Christopher K. Fairley, Jane S. Hocking, Desiree Tse, Nicolas Verschueren van Rees, William C. W. Wong, Jason J. Ong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,133,459
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,958
of 10,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,177
of 432,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#129
of 1,265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.