The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The corporate influence on food charity and aid: The “Hunger Industrial Complex” and the death of welfare
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.950955 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Caraher, Sinéad Furey |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,218,150
of 25,393,071 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,431
of 14,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,528
of 432,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#164
of 1,346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.