You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using 5 consecutive years of NICE guidance to describe the characteristics and influencing factors on the economic evaluation of orphan oncology drugs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.964040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duan Shengnan, Lv Zixuan, Zhou Na, Zhu Weikai, Yi Yuanyuan, Liu Jiasu, Yuan Ni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,392,139
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,628
of 11,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,202
of 433,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#315
of 1,374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.