↓ Skip to main content

Self-collection of capillary blood and saliva to determine COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and health professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-collection of capillary blood and saliva to determine COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and health professionals
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.994770
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Schmetzer, Ekaterina Vogt, Laura Stellar, Elie-Tino Godonou, Anna-Maria Liphardt, Felix Muehlensiepen, Nicolas Vuillerme, Axel J. Hueber, Arnd Kleyer, Gerhard Krönke, Georg Schett, David Simon, Johannes Knitza

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#18,311,819
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,484
of 11,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,058
of 441,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#602
of 1,455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.