The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of trend in chronic kidney disease burden between China, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.999848 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haoyu Wen, Donghui Yang, Cong Xie, Fang Shi, Yan Liu, Jiaming Zhang, Chuanhua Yu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Librarian | 1 | 5% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 16% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#6,298
of 14,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,707
of 432,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#537
of 1,396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.