You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A novel approach for assessing bias during team-based clinical decision-making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1014773 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Pool, Megan Hebdon, Esther de Groot, Ryan Yee, Kathryn Herrera-Theut, Erika Yee, Larry A. Allen, Ayesha Hasan, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Elizabeth Calhoun, Molly Carnes, Nancy K. Sweitzer, Khadijah Breathett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,023,141
of 25,152,132 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,208
of 13,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,778
of 388,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#193
of 826 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,152,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 826 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.