The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cost-effectiveness analysis of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine and the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine among Thai older adult
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1071117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thundon Ngamprasertchai, Chayanis Kositamongkol, Saranath Lawpoolsri, Pinyo Rattanaumpawan, Viravarn Luvira, Piriyaporn Chongtrakool, Jaranit Kaewkungwal, Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit, Pochamana Phisalprapa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,354,674
of 26,213,016 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#8,315
of 14,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,456
of 382,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#431
of 855 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 855 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.