You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility assessment of crowdsourcing slogans for promoting household waste segregation in India: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1118331 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kavya Krishnan, Krushna Chandra Sahoo, Madhanraj Kalyanasundaram, Surya Singh, Asha Srinivas, Ashish Pathak, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg, Salla Atkins, Kamran Rousta, Vishal Diwan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,659,715
of 24,719,968 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,888
of 13,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,721
of 244,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#64
of 561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,719,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.