You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review: Virtual-reality-based techniques for human exercises and health improvement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1143947 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saba Ghazanfar Ali, Xiangning Wang, Ping Li, Younhyun Jung, Lei Bi, Jinman Kim, Yuting Chen, David Dagan Feng, Nadia Magnenat Thalmann, Jihong Wang, Bin Sheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 72 | 75% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 70 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#14,942,986
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,056
of 14,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,165
of 426,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#226
of 1,105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.