The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Continuous false positive results by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing: a case report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1240308 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yannick Galipeau, Abishek Xavier, Aaron Dyks, Curtis Cooper, Marc-André Langlois |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,806,483
of 26,316,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,734
of 14,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,765
of 373,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#176
of 826 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 826 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.