The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol of the CONSORT and SPIRIT Extension for multicenter clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1241152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xuan Zhang, Chongya Dong, Nana Wang, Chunpong Chan, Chung Tai Lau, Juan Wang, Jiangxia Miao, Chen Yao, Youping Li, Aiping Lyu, David Moher, Zhaoxiang Bian |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#21,915,714
of 24,452,594 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#9,003
of 12,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,631
of 175,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#163
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,452,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.