The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing future heat stress across China: combined effects of heat and relative humidity on mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282497 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guwei Zhang, Ling Han, Jiajun Yao, Jiaxi Yang, Zhiqi Xu, Xiuhua Cai, Jin Huang, Lin Pei |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,440,102
of 25,200,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,414
of 13,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,530
of 345,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#92
of 785 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,200,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 785 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.