↓ Skip to main content

A study on the use of acupoint catgut embedding in the treatment of pre-diabetes: a meta-analysis and data mining approach

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A study on the use of acupoint catgut embedding in the treatment of pre-diabetes: a meta-analysis and data mining approach
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282720
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunfeng Yu, Xuan Xu, Danni Tan, Yuman Yin, Xinyu Yang, Rong Yu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#21,688,118
of 26,628,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#8,536
of 15,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,278
of 396,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#399
of 805 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,628,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 805 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.