The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the effect of adverse economic events on severity of hunger among food pantry clients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1286094 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Candice Bangham, Rachel M. Zack, Eva Nelson, Xinyang Liu, Alyson Codner, Jacqueline Milton Hicks, Jacey A. Greece |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,248,180
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,036
of 13,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,127
of 165,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#59
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.