The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Successes and challenges of best practice alerts to identify and engage individuals living with hepatitis C virus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1281079 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saniya Tandon, Roselyn Castaneda, Nadia Tarasco, Janie Percival, Roberto Nieto Linares, Glen Geiger, Curtis L. Cooper |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,800,601
of 26,071,599 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#6,595
of 14,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,906
of 193,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#64
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,071,599 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.