The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of polygenic risk scores and digital technologies for INNOvative personalized cardiovascular disease PREVention in high-risk adults: protocol of a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1335894 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberta Pastorino, Angelo Maria Pezzullo, Antonella Agodi, Chiara de Waure, Walter Mazzucco, Luigi Russo, Martina Bianchi, Alessandra Maio, Sara Farina, Martina Porcelli, Diego Maria Tona, Matteo Di Pumpo, Rosarita Amore, Malgorzata Wachocka, Tina Pasciuto, Martina Barchitta, Roberta Magnano San Lio, Giuliana Favara, Antonino Tuttolomondo, Fabio Tramuto, Gaia Morello, Daniele Domenico De Bella, Santo Fruscione, Anna Severino, Giovanna Liuzzo, Stefania Boccia |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 63% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 63% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Engineering | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#21,280,958
of 26,135,447 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#8,256
of 14,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,012
of 154,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#83
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,135,447 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.