The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
U.S. food policy to address diet-related chronic disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339859 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily D. Matthews, Emma L. Kurnat-Thoma |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,050,246
of 26,206,339 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,373
of 14,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,675
of 302,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#25
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,206,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.