↓ Skip to main content

Methodologies for the collection of parameters to estimate dust/soil ingestion for young children

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methodologies for the collection of parameters to estimate dust/soil ingestion for young children
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1357346
Authors

Alesia Ferguson, Foluke Adelabu, Helena Solo-Gabriele, Emmanuel Obeng-Gyasi, Cristina Fayad-Martinez, Maribeth Gidley, Jenna Honan, Olusola O. Ogunseye, Paloma I. Beamer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#16,078,223
of 26,200,644 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,860
of 14,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,480
of 151,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#44
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,200,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.