The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiovascular disease risk: it is complicated, but race and ethnicity are key, a Bayesian network analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1364730 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole P. Bowles, Yimin He, Yueng-hsiang Huang, Eric C. Stecker, Azizi Seixas, Saurabh S. Thosar |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2024.
All research outputs
#16,556,847
of 26,115,614 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,217
of 14,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,146
of 151,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#49
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,115,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.