The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
HIARA study protocol: impacts of artificial coral reef development on fisheries, human livelihoods and health in southwestern Madagascar
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1366110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher D. Golden, Aaron C. Hartmann, Emma Gibbons, Gildas Todinanahary, Max F. Troell, Gaelle Ampalaza, Faustinato Behivoke, Jean Marie David, Jean-Dominique Durand, Aroniaina M. Falinirina, Christopher Frånberg, Frédéric Declèrque, Kimberly Hook, Heather Kelahan, Megumi Kirby, Karestan Koenen, Thomas Lamy, Thierry Lavitra, Franciana Moridy, Marc Léopold, Mark J. Little, Jean C. Mahefa, Jovial Mbony, Khristopher Nicholas, Aina Le Don Nomenisoa, Dominique Ponton, Roddy R. Rabarijaona, Mihary Rabearison, Sarah A. Rabemanantsoa, Mbolahasina Ralijaona, Harinirina S. Ranaivomanana, Hervet J. Randriamady, José Randrianandrasana, Hanitra O. Randriatsara, Roddy M. Randriatsara, Madeleine Rasoanirina, Michel R. Ratsizafy, Kinasa F. Razafiely, Nivohanitra Razafindrasoa, Romario, Marc Y. Solofoarimanana, Rocky E. Stroud, Mandimbilaza Tsiresimiary, Anissa J. Volanandiana, Nadège V. Volasoa, Brooke Vowell, Jessica Zamborain-Mason |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 50% |
| Researcher | 2 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#17,278,155
of 26,337,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,788
of 14,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,207
of 150,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#35
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,337,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.