↓ Skip to main content

Fine particulate matter-sudden death association modified by ventricular hypertrophy and inflammation: a case-crossover study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fine particulate matter-sudden death association modified by ventricular hypertrophy and inflammation: a case-crossover study
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1367416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen M. Rappazzo, Nicole M. Egerstrom, Jianyong Wu, Alia B. Capone, Golsa Joodi, Susan Keen, Wayne E. Cascio, Ross J. Simpson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,477,007
of 26,105,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,496
of 14,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,305
of 208,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#41
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,105,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.