You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vitro study of radiosensitivity in colorectal cancer cell lines associated with Lynch syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1369201 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mingzhu Sun, Jayne Moquet, Stephen Barnard, Hannah Mancey, David Burling, Rachel Baldwin-Cleland, Kevin Monahan, Andrew Latchford, David Lloyd, Simon Bouffler, Christophe Badie, Nicola A. Anyamene, Elizabeth Ainsbury |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,655,566
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,684
of 14,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,835
of 221,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#41
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.