You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Innovations in older adult care and health service management: a focus on the Asia-Pacific region
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1369827 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Madhan Balasubramanian, Angie A. Shafei, Zhanming Liang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 1 | 50% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,742,013
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#845
of 14,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,016
of 281,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#14
of 676 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 676 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.