↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of bladder carcinogenesis biomarkers in the urine of traditional cigarette users and e-cigarette users

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of bladder carcinogenesis biomarkers in the urine of traditional cigarette users and e-cigarette users
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1385628
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lida Feng, Guixiao Huang, Lei Peng, Rui Liang, Dashi Deng, Shaohua Zhang, Guangzhi Li, Song Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,763,030
of 25,964,892 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,738
of 14,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,204
of 249,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#35
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,964,892 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.