The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Solidifying the minority high school student pathway: evidence from the health professions recruitment and exposure program
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1408859 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Murtala I. Affini, Ashley Diaz, Daniel J. Dolan, Symphony Fletcher, Isra Hasnain, Isaiah Selkridge, Stephanie Washington, Abdullah Pratt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 80% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,229,316
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,432
of 14,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,382
of 305,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#56
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.