The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
External RF-EMF alters cell number and ROS balance possibly via the regulation of NADPH metabolism and apoptosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1425023 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sheung-Ching Chow, Yang Zhang, Raymond W. M. Ng, Shu-Yuen Ron Hui, Ilia A. Solov’yov, Wing-Yee Lui |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,844,119
of 26,521,103 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,266
of 15,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,160
of 180,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#13
of 343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,521,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.