↓ Skip to main content

Craniometric determinants of the fitted filtration efficiency of disposable masks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Craniometric determinants of the fitted filtration efficiency of disposable masks
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1444411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob S. Griffin, E. Melissa McInroe, Edward R. Pennington, William Steinhardt, Hao Chen, Steven E. Prince, James M. Samet

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#5,734,841
of 26,529,613 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,680
of 15,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,509
of 143,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#15
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,529,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.