You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Healthy Older Adults to Determine Efficacy of Glycine and N-Acetylcysteine Supplementation on Glutathione Redox Status and Oxidative Damage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fragi.2022.852569 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giulia Lizzo, Eugenia Migliavacca, Daniela Lamers, Adrien Frézal, John Corthesy, Gerard Vinyes-Parès, Nabil Bosco, Leonidas G. Karagounis, Ulrike Hövelmann, Tim Heise, Maximilian von Eynatten, Philipp Gut |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 79% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#840,609
of 26,202,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging
#19
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,304
of 453,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,202,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.