The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular mechanisms of genotype-dependent lifespan variation mediated by caloric restriction: insight from wild yeast isolates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fragi.2024.1408160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha McLean, Mitchell Lee, Weiqiang Liu, Rohil Hameed, Vikas Anil Gujjala, Xuming Zhou, Matt Kaeberlein, Alaattin Kaya |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2024.
All research outputs
#7,169,224
of 26,308,718 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging
#146
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,247
of 151,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,308,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.