You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulating GDF-15: a biomarker for metabolic dysregulation and aging in people living with HIV
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fragi.2024.1414866 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ling Wang, Juan Zhao, Madison Schank, Addison C. Hill, Puja Banik, Yi Zhang, Xiao Y. Wu, Janet W. Lightner, Shunbin Ning, Mohamed El Gazzar, Jonathan P. Moorman, Zhi Q. Yao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,803,888
of 26,077,794 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging
#297
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,094
of 148,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,077,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.