↓ Skip to main content

Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Ebola Virus' Impact on Gene Expression in Nonhuman Primates

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Ebola Virus' Impact on Gene Expression in Nonhuman Primates
Published in
arXiv, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/frai.2024.1405332
Authors

Mostafa Rezapour, Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi, Hao Lu, Aarthi Narayanan, Metin Nafi Gurcan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2024.
All research outputs
#16,804,709
of 26,559,762 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#283,302
of 1,008,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,554
of 385,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#6,955
of 37,612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,008,661 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37,612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.