The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The distribution of Apis laboriosa revisited: range extensions, biogeographic affinities, and species distribution modelling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bee Science, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frbee.2024.1374852 |
| Authors |
Gard W. Otis, Man-Juan Huang, Nyaton Kitnya, Umer Ayyaz Aslam Sheikh, Abu ul Hassan Faiz, Chinh H. Phung, Natapot Warrit, Yan-Qiong Peng, Xin Zhou, Hlaing Min Oo, Namoona Acharya, Kedar Devkota |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#15,247,493
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bee Science
#6
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,621
of 140,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bee Science
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.