↓ Skip to main content

What does the history of Theraphosidae systematics tell us about the future of tarantula taxonomy?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Arachnid Science, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What does the history of Theraphosidae systematics tell us about the future of tarantula taxonomy?
Published in
Frontiers in Arachnid Science, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/frchs.2024.1445731
Authors

Ethan J. Briggs, Chris A. Hamilton

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#7,686,493
of 26,556,730 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Arachnid Science
#9
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,859
of 136,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Arachnid Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,730 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.