The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Women in science: Pulmonary rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fresc.2023.1130757 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jana De Brandt, Ana Oliveira, Cristina Jácome |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 3 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,651,054
of 26,094,193 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
#111
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,818
of 483,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
#19
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,094,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.