The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence based clinical practice guideline for follow-up care in persons with spinal cord injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, September 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fresc.2024.1371556 |
| Authors |
Inge Eriks-Hoogland, Lorena Müller, Michael Baumberger, Burkhart Huber, Franz Michel, Celina Belfrage, Hicham Elmerghini, Mide Veseli-Abazi, Ralf Böthig, Kai Fiebag, Roland Thietje, Xavier Jordan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2024.
All research outputs
#21,660,835
of 26,593,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
#492
of 724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,356
of 128,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,593,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 724 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.