The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How the experiences of implementation support recipients contribute to implementation outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Health Services, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frhs.2024.1323807 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Allison J. Metz, Todd M. Jensen, Jenny L. Afkinich, Mackensie E. Disbennett, Amanda B. Farley |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,384,398
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Health Services
#47
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,476
of 303,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Health Services
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.