↓ Skip to main content

Examining Characteristics of Traditional and Twitter Citation

Overview of attention for article published in Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining Characteristics of Traditional and Twitter Citation
Published in
Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), August 2016
DOI 10.3389/frma.2016.00006
Authors

Hyojung Jung, Keeheon Lee, Min Song

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
United States 1 6%
Netherlands 1 6%
Unknown 14 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 29%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Linguistics 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#252
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,720
of 354,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.