The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Poor Altmetric Performance of Publications Authored by Researchers in Mainland China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frma.2016.00008 |
| Authors |
Xianwen Wang, Zhichao Fang, Qingchun Li, Xinhui Guo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 42% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 58% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 25% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,618,238
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#146
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,339
of 321,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.