↓ Skip to main content

SYMBALS: A Systematic Review Methodology Blending Active Learning and Snowballing

Overview of attention for article published in Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SYMBALS: A Systematic Review Methodology Blending Active Learning and Snowballing
Published in
Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), May 2021
DOI 10.3389/frma.2021.685591
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max van Haastrecht, Injy Sarhan, Bilge Yigit Ozkan, Matthieu Brinkhuis, Marco Spruit

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Lecturer 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 17 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 6 11%
Engineering 5 9%
Computer Science 5 9%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 18 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,995,399
of 26,423,535 outputs
Outputs from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#109
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,172
of 465,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,423,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.