↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: How to Play the Science Game: Insights on Scientific Teams

Overview of attention for article published in Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: How to Play the Science Game: Insights on Scientific Teams
Published in
Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), November 2021
DOI 10.3389/frma.2021.802557
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stijn Kelchtermans, Cindy Lopes-Bento, Fabiana Visentin, Cornelia Lawson

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,576,290
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#199
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,810
of 530,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.