↓ Skip to main content

On Intrinsic Safety of Soft Robots

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On Intrinsic Safety of Soft Robots
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2017.00005
Authors

Haider Abidi, Matteo Cianchetti

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 30%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 39 49%
Computer Science 2 3%
Materials Science 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2024.
All research outputs
#7,455,393
of 26,571,961 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#454
of 1,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,565
of 327,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,961 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.