↓ Skip to main content

Desktop VR Is Better Than Non-ambulatory HMD VR for Spatial Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Desktop VR Is Better Than Non-ambulatory HMD VR for Spatial Learning
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2019.00050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priyanka Srivastava, Anurag Rimzhim, Palash Vijay, Shruti Singh, Sushil Chandra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 20 17%
Psychology 13 11%
Engineering 11 9%
Neuroscience 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 36 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,048,427
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#915
of 1,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,340
of 346,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#24
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.