↓ Skip to main content

From care practices to speculative vignettes–design considerations for robots in good care

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From care practices to speculative vignettes–design considerations for robots in good care
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2024.1347367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralf Vetter, Anna Dobrosovestnova, Helena Anna Frijns, Laura Vogel, Katharina Brunnmayr, Christopher Frauenberger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,757,119
of 26,445,299 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#1,796
of 1,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,119
of 138,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.